Nova must find his identity as a pitcher

Nova needs a “throwback” to his 2011 ways

The Yankee rotation has been rounding into shape a bit over the last couple of weeks.  The comeback of Andy Pettitte has been huge as a stabilizing addition and Phil Hughes has been much better of late also.  Hiroki Kuroda has had his problems and sure isn’t a number 2 starter in the Al East.  However, with CC & Andy making up a solid 1-2 punch of lefties who will always fight and give a strong outing, the Yanks can afford Hughes and Kuroda at the back-end of the rotation.  The big question mark is who is Ivan Nova?  Is he the quality #3 pitcher who went 16-4 with a 3.70 ERA last year – or is he the pitcher with an ERA pushing 6 this year who has been wildly inconsistent from inning to inning?

Nova seems to be going through an identity crisis as a pitcher this year.  In the minors and last season he was a ground ball machine who featured a hard, sinking fastball that induced grounders and greatly limited HRs.  He was 7th in the A.L with a miniscule 0.71 HR/9 ratio and 5th in the league with a 52.7% Ground Ball Rate.  He let batters put the ball in play and watched his defense do the work as he ony struck out 5.3 per 9 ip.  That formula was successful last year but in order for him to progress as a pitcher, he needed  to add a swing and miss pitch.  He began incorporating a Slider in the 2nd half last year and it was a successful pitch that led to more strikeouts and had fans excited for 2012.

This year, it seems Nova is eschewing his GB pitching ways and attempting to put hitters away himself.  According to brooksbaseball.net, he has only thrown his Fastball 50% of the time as opposed to 61% last year.  His Slider usage has jumped from 13% to 20%.  The change to more breaking pitches has led to a huge rise in Strikeouts as he’s among MLB leaders this yr with a 9.55 K/9.  While the rise in Strikeouts has been a positive outcome from his changed approach, Nova has also endured a huge negative also.  He’s giving up Hits and especially HRs at an alarming rate.  His HR/9 has more than doubled from last yr at 1.84 as he’s allowed 10 HRs in 49 IP after allowing 13 all of last season in 165 IP.  That is a very disturbing trend.

One reason for those trends is he isn’t getting the same downward movement on his pitches this season.  Brooks shows the vertical movement on his Fastball has risen from -16.7 inches to -14.4 inches.  In fact, all of his pitches have less downward movement according to the pitch f/x data.  This leads me to believe Nova has slightly dropped his arm angle and isn’t getting on top of his pitches, thus the more Flyballs, Hits & HRs.

If you are a believer in luck than Nova is due for a turnaround.  Although his ERA is 5.69, he has a 3.47 xfip and 3.31 SIERA which would foretell a drop in ERA is coming.  He has allowed an enormous .393 Batting Average on Balls in Play – an unsustainable number that has to come down.  Last yr it was .283.  The other number due to drop is his 19.2% HR/FB rate.  Nearly 1 in 5 of his Fly Balls have left the park as opposed to just 8.4% last season.  However, there have been reasons for theses huge ratios that looking at mere numbers can’t tell you.  Nova has had very poor command this year and has been wild within the zone.  He has been missing his spots – pitching up and in the middle of the strike zone far too often.  During games he seems to get on a roll striking people out but loses concentration and makes mistakes which have not been missed by batters.  His Fastball command has been poor but he has hung far too many off speed pitches as 8 of his 10 HRs have been on off speed pitches – 3 Sliders, 1 Curve & 4 Change Ups.  His Change Up in particular has been a true Gopher pitch.  He’s only thrown it 43 times with 4 of them leaving the Yard – so nearly 10% of his Change Ups are HRs!

Nova needs to find himself as a pitcher.  I believe he needs to look at his release point and find out why his pitches aren’t getting the same downward action.  Throw his Sinking Fastball more often to induce more grounders and he MUST maintain concentration to better command his off speed stuff.  We know Nova can be successful based on his performance last yr and his stuff is very good.  His Fastball sits around 93 MPH and when he drives it down in the zone, it is a nasty pitch.  His Slider and Curveball have both shown very positive signs and have been behind his rise in Strikeouts.  When located, his Change can be effective vs lefties.  All the ingredients are there.  Nova just has to harness his stuff and embrace the fact that he’s a better pitcher inducing ground balls.  This is easier said than done and can often take pitchers years to learn how to pitch and command all their pitches.  How fast Nova can do this may be the key to the rotation this year.  If he continues to struggle, it won’t be long before a demotion to AAA becomes a reality.  However, if he can pitch the way he did last season the Yankees will have a 1-3 of CC, Pettitte, Nova that can throw a lot of quality starts and will make Hughes and Kuroda acceptable 4th and 5th starters.

About fishjam25

Was a 4-yr Pitcher and Communications Major at Seton Hall University in the 90s. His knowledge & opinion of the game comes from his background as a player and ardent lifetime Yankee fan. However, Fishjam also incorporates sabermetrics and statistical support to form a well-rounded view of the game.

Posted on May 24, 2012, in No Category. Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. Very hot posting Fishjam, I would have Phil over Nova in my line-up! What do you see that I don’t?
    I see Nova as throwing less long balls and more Ground balls than Phil but what else?
    And again, thanks for your reply earlier! 🙂

    • Great article Fish. Good work as always.

    • Thanks Ken. I prefer Nova over Hughes long-term because I really don’t like Hughes’ mechanics or arm-action. The way he throws limits what pitches he can use as he doesn’t get enough downward action. He has a plus Fastball but his offspeed pitch is mediocre at best. he needs great command to have success and since he doesn’t have a put away pitch he will always be apt to high pitch counts.

      I like Nova’s mechanics better and his arm is free and easy. He’s shown a plus 93-94 sinking Fastball that was his bread-and-butter last yr. And he has the makings of 2 plus pitches in hs Slider and Curve. The other thing I like about him is he has shown that he will compete on the mound and has a knack for doing what is needed to win as evidence by his 20-6 record over his last 35 starts. He may have some growing pains this year but I like him better than Phil as a starter for the future. Also, Phil is starting to get more expensive while Nova makes league minimum still.

      • Fishjam…
        I agree and we have talked about Phils mechanics a few times. Ok, I’ll give you that!
        The thing I keep thinking of is the BP for next year. MO, Joba, D-Rob, Phil, Logan, Wade for starters!
        Rotation; CC, Phelps, Nova, and a plethora of players including the two from Seattle.
        Question for you; When Mo hangs it up, I see Joba as the closer unless, they go out and buy one somewhere…where do you stand on Mos’ replacement?

        • Aardsma…….Don’t forget about Aardsma. He will be on this team soon enough and the Yankees control his option for next year as well I think.

  2. Great article Fish!!
    I have hope for Nova, not giving up on him.

  3. fishjam, great article. I like all the sabermetrics and relating that to common pithing terms. I agree most young pitchers like Nova and Hughes will only be as good as their location. They both have the stuff to win in the majors. I think part of their problem is that they were both over used because the Yanks always make the playoffs. Hughes two years ago and Nova last year. Once a pitcher gets up to around 180 innings it seems that young pitchers don’t all respond well. Nova increase in HRs this year reminds me of Burnett last year as does his K/9 ratio. Nova also has a high BABIP this year and last year. I wouldn’t count on him as a top starter just yet, his sampling is too small. Look at Buchholz and Moore both have more upside than Nova and have been struggling.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: